The Chubby Caucasian Christian Closeted Conservative

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/11/politics/trump-germany-russia-captive-nato/index.html Of course he was criticized for these remarks in 2018 but they don’t seem so crazy now, do they? I would encourage everyone to watch the full video of his remarks at this NATO summit. Looking back now this all seems very accurate and very relevant. Its interesting MSNBC’s Donny Deutsch claimed that Trump was owned by Putin, yet Trump attempted to talk NATO into not buying and fully relying on Russian oil. Romney and Trump have been proven to be right on Russia, while Obama and Biden allowed Putin to run free in Europe. Obama and Biden allowed and never questioned our allies and their dealings with Russia. In a CNN interview German Defense Minister stated that they had “a very diverse mix of energy supplies” and said that German chancellor Merkel had “been at the forefront of diplomatic efforts to curb Russian aggression in Ukraine”. Is it fair to say Merkel was NOT successful in curbing Russian aggress...

  https://www.foxnews.com/media/donald-trump-russian-asset-msnbc Talk about spreading misinformation! Donny Deutsch does not even realize he is quoting Mitt Romney from 7 years earlier, stating Russia is our “geopolitical enemy”. Joe Scarborough even dismissed Deutsch’s claims at that VERY moment and stated that it was “speculation and only speculation right now”. However, Scarborough goes on to claim that Trump is compromised and “Trump to cede power in the Middle East and help Russia strategically” makes him a Russian asset? Does that look like, green lighting a Russian pipeline and not sanctioning Putin directly have he chose to invade Ukraine? If so, that was not Trump. Direct Quotes President Trump is a Russian asset who has laundered money for Vladimir Putin for decades in order to save his struggling casinos, MSNBC's Donny Deutsch claimed Thursday. “You talk to any banker in New York, any business person in New York, any real estate person … we have a president that’s sellin...

  https://www.tumblr.com/chubbycaucasianchristiancloseted/search/Trump This “about” page for the January 6th committee surprisingly does not include the words “Donald” or “Trump”. However I posted this so you can read for yourself what this January 6th committee believes their purpose to be. Direct Quotes: “[T]he underlying drivers for domestic violent extremism – such as perceptions of government or law enforcement overreach, sociopolitical conditions, racism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, misogyny, and reactions to legislative actions – remain constant.”; To investigate and report upon the facts, circumstances, and causes relating to the January 6, 2021

 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-legal-authority-declassify-intelligence/story?id=47436559 Under Executive Order 13526 a president has the legal power to declassify information. The ruling was confirmed by the SCOTUS in 1988. Was Donald Trump president when those documents left the White House? NPR continuously states that there is a “criminal investigation” along with a NIRA violation.  Can someone explain how this is worse then what Hillary or Berger did? Direct Quotes:  Executive Order 13526 As president, Trump has the legal power to declassify information. He also has the authority to share information with whomever he wants, including foreign adversaries. Trump is protected under an executive order that was signed by Barack Obama in 2009 establishing a uniform system for "classifying, safeguarding and declassifying national security information." The Supreme Court confirmed as much in its 1988 ruling in Department of Navy v. Egan. #USA #TheChubbyCaucasianChristian...

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Yf7fX4m-9c Thank you Babylon Bee for the laugh. My favorite part is the guy who is considered raciest for putting on a MAGA hat! #USA #TheChubbyCaucasianChristianClosetedConservative #BabylonBee #Woke #Intersectionality

  https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/to-cut-std-rate-calif-considers-condoms-in-prison/ I would have to agree with Assemblyman Dan Logue of Marysville, it appear that laws such as these might encourage law breaking. It’s a felony for prisoners to have intercourse while they’re in prison (besides a few rare circumstances). Shouldn’t we attempt to enforce that law equally? It’s an interesting dilemma. Do we aid law breaking? Or attempt to enforce all laws equally at a possible risk of an individual’s health? Maybe buying security equipment, hiring more guards or building better prisons would be a better use of resources, time and money spent then distributing condoms. According to the CDC the most reliable way to avoid transmission of STDs is to abstain from sexual activity. Enforcing the laws in place would force people to avoid sexual activity and therefore is the most reliable way to avoid STD transmission. I have difficulty believing that not a single security issue has happ...

 https://apnews.com/article/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0 I’m fine with people claiming that the science “changes” or theories have “changed” or are “incorrect” but it would be nice to have the same grace for people who might question some science. Now please don’t misunderstand me, with this old article from the Associated Press I’m not trying to disprove science, I’m not a science or global warming denier by any means. I want my children to grow up on a healthy planet. The main point I’m trying to make is that sometimes the science or “facts” the media forces upon us, we should be allowed to question. Direct Quotes A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program...

https://www.nytimes.com/article/trump-cognitive-test.html Joe Biden should take the same test. The media, including the Washington Post, continued to down play the difficulty of the test and even said the test is too “blunt” of an instrument and for most people it’s too “easy” and “the test is not that difficult”. If that is true, then the genius that is president now should have no problem! Direct Quote: But it is by no means definitive, or even diagnostic, experts pointed out. And as the president tries to draw a contrast between his mental faculties and those of Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., a fellow septuagenarian he expects to face off against in November’s election, some experts criticize his politicization of such cognitive screening tests. “You would think he would understand clearly what the test result was and why the test was done,” Dr. Karlawish said, “and not turn it into a competition about mental health.” This screening test was designed about 20 years ago as a pos...

  https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/may/16/james-risch/does-president-have-ability-declassify-anything-an/ This article appears to confirm that the president “has the ability to declassify anything at any time without any process". Experts agree that the president’s classification powers are very board and that they are “ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. According to a 1988 Supreme Court case and Article II of the constitution the court found that the control of access to information directly flows from the power of the President. While interviewing a University Law professor they stated “"There’s no question that the president has broad authority to declassify almost anything at any time without any process”. One reason that this article was deemed “mostly true” is because of two “caveats” the second being that it’s not a “sensible” idea. I would love to confirm with John Pike (the director of globalsecurity.org) that if a verified sour...

  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-investigates-the-duke-rape-case/ Always racing to be first, never to be accurate. The media repeatedly races to conclusions and the majority of times you are guilty until proven innocent. 60 Minutess admits that "It seemed like most of the media and the public and government leaders had already made up their minds that the players were guilty" and the forensic expert involved in the case failed to report crucial DNA evidence that would have cleared the boys. I BEG Democrats next time a Caucasian, Cis, male is accused of something, can we please wait 72 hours before rioting and burning down cities? I know that is tough for you. I get it, the hate and anger building down deep inside but it’s nice to hear other stuff besides just the accusation. Every accuser deserves to be heard and taken seriously and every accused deserves to be innocent until proven guilty.   Direct Quotes: It's a story 60 Minutes co-producers Michael Radutzky an...