The Chubby Caucasian Christian Closeted Conservative

  https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2004/07/24/sandy-berger-a-case-for-accountability/8c1c6c1a-8f46-48fe-be32-7d78c7d21763/ I love the first & last paragraph of this article! It 100% relates to the Trump Case! The major difference is we know how this type of investigations turns out for Democrats. Sandy Berger was given a lax punishment and Clinton was let off. Another Washington Post article said that Berger “constantly lost track of papers or appointments without subordinates to keep him organized and on schedule.’For all those who know and love him, it's easy to see how this could happen’”. so not only was he a lire and a thief but he was also late and incompetent. Hope he looked in his socks and pants every time he lost something. We have a two tier justice system, those for the wealthy Democrats that are protected by the media and their friends and the rest of us. Berger’s attorney and the Democratic Party at the time said Berger committed this felony “inadve...

  https://www.foxnews.com/story/former-clinton-aide-pleads-guilty-to-taking-classified-docs.print Allow me to add 1 conservative media source. The past 2 days I’ve posted CNN and NBC. When Sandy Berger was told by the National Archives that documents were missing, HE LIED! The Dems tried to cover for the Clintons and Berger, saying he only had “copies of documents” and all the originals remained in the governments’ possession. Will similar standards be applied to Trump? We should all remember that Berger was trying to prepare for the 9/11 commission. Does your reasoning for having the documents, change how we should judge or criticizes people who have classified documents? Berger admitted that twice in 2013, he removed classified anti-terror documents by putting them in his jacket, his pants and in a leather case. Apparently this was a “mistake”; I’m guessing these documents accidentally fell into his pants? Direct Quotes Berger, who served as President Clinton's national security ...

  https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna7351422 Not only did former Clinton National Security aide, Sandy Berger, remove highly classified documents, destroy them, lie about it but claimed to do it so he was prepared for the 9/11 commission! Of course MSNBC, The AP and CNN run to his rescue and point out that the investigation was disclosed by the Bush WH to distract from the 9/11 commission report and an “honest mistake”. Psh! Biden’s DOJ raid probably has nothing to do with the upcoming election. I’m just looking for consistency from the Democratic Party; do we want classified documents in the National Archives? If someone takes them out and destroys them is that bad? OR should the law be applied differently depending on someone’s political affiliation or current/ formal title? I KNOW THE LAWS HAVE CHANGED BUT Berger was given a very relaxed sentence after he pled guilty.    Direct Quotes Sandy Berger, who was President Clinton’s top national security aide, pleaded guilty Frid...

  https://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/08/berger.sentenced/ Allow me to take all the Radical Progressive Liberal Larrys and Lindas back in time long, long ago when a former National Security Adviser went into the National Archives and stole classified information! Sandy Berger removed “highly classified documents from the National Archives” and intentionally destroyed them. gasp! Highly Classified documents! He is a foreign agent and should be charged with the espionage act and investigated for treason! Correct? He was sentenced to 100hrs of community service and probation and fined $50,000. I wonder how the Democrats feel about this Bill Clinton aide? Should we remain consistent and treat everyone the same? Or do we ask for the death penalty for some and allow others to get off with a small fine? Any sort of consistency from the Democratic party would be greatly appreciated. He stated that he destroyed these documents in an attempt to prepare himself to assist with the 9/11 commis...